Differences between the Articles of confederation and the new Research Paper

Differences between the Articles of confederation and the new constitution - Research Paper ExampleThe articles created a swooning subject area authorities incapable levying taxes and regulating carry on hence the quest for the new constitution that change the stature of the governance by increasing its powers (Wendel 768). The removal of the articles of confederation was due to their huge powers over the national government. The articles lacked a court system to impose the levying plus collection of taxes. The congress was incapable of reservation laws and hence levying of taxes was punishing. In addition, the articles did not provide an atmosphere for enhancing trade regulation between the existing states and early(a) countries (Young 1572). The articles could only allow only a vote per state and too many powers to states. It also performed the functions of appointing the delegates for every state, which was undesirable. It was difficult to impose changes to the article s of confederation because there were undesirable procedures. All the states had to make amicable decisions to enhance the changes. Having all the xiii states in agreement over changes that would affect the government was not an easy task. Nine out of bakers dozen states had to approve any motion put forward to enhance amendment of the articles. Another weakness evident in the articles was the lack of a specific army to guard the nation. Each state stood separately with own personal matters (Wendel 760). Every state developed policies for their own governance, not even the passage of treaties was a responsibility of the primaeval government. Since very state created their own money, there was a possibility of lack of acceptance to their money by other states. This created an unfavorable environment for the states to participate in trade and improve their micro economies. The unicameral law-makers present in the articles provided an atmosphere that there was no power separation hence the national government remained weak (Young 1570). The operation of the post offices was a responsibility of the states and not the central government. The articles of confederation developed immense powers to the states. In the articles there were sections supporting assertion of wars plus coining and borrowing of finances. The central government was incapable of making the states to abide by the laws. Despite the national governments efforts to make a nationwide currency, the currency was valueless due to existing currencies from the states (Wirkner 13). The lack of effective common currency led to weak trade plus commerce that retarded the general economy of the United States. Vulner skill to attack by other countries plus pirates was evident due to the lack of a central army and army to safe calabash tree the entire populace. The articles were prevalent because of the fear instilled to the colonies by the colonial government. The authorities from the states with the fea r instilled by the powers of the colonial government centrality of governance feared the same (Jensen 10). The articles thus provided sovereign states in terms of decision-making and freedom. The articles were an important law of the land ahead promulgation of the new constitution, which made a through way for changes in the government operations. The executive valued the elimination of the articles to create room for most operations for the central government. For years, there was deprivation in the ability of the